|
Title: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 11, 2009, 06:57:11 AM Ok so who knows what has gone down here?? (this time)
Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: Craig on August 11, 2009, 09:18:09 AM You mean you had nothing to do with it ? :o
Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: Ian T on August 11, 2009, 09:38:26 AM Nope, no PH involvement in this.
Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 11, 2009, 02:12:34 PM Nope, no PH involvement in this. Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. becarefull until you know all the facts, remember you gave out private details of instructors!!!!!!!! I believe that the individual spoke to the landowner of another non CDAA controlled site not the Scotts???? Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 11, 2009, 02:35:24 PM You mean you had nothing to do with it ? :o I had nothing to do with the last one Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: Ian T on August 11, 2009, 07:24:51 PM Nope, no PH involvement in this. Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. becarefull until you know all the facts, remember you gave out private details of instructors!!!!!!!! I believe that the individual spoke to the landowner of another non CDAA controlled site not the Scotts???? The fact that I do know is that you're a fuckwit Paul Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 12, 2009, 06:04:44 AM Nope, no PH involvement in this. Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. becarefull until you know all the facts, remember you gave out private details of instructors!!!!!!!! I believe that the individual spoke to the landowner of another non CDAA controlled site not the Scotts???? The fact that I do know is that you're a fuckwit Paul no need to get personal Ian, I wonder if that will come up if you run for SD? hmmmm. Ian dont give if you cant take mate!! Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: onwardsupwards on August 12, 2009, 03:33:27 PM Nope, no PH involvement in this. Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. becarefull until you know all the facts, remember you gave out private details of instructors!!!!!!!! I believe that the individual spoke to the landowner of another non CDAA controlled site not the Scotts???? The fact that I do know is that you're a fuckwit Paul no need to get personal Ian , I wonder if that will come up if you run for SD? hmmmm. Ian dont give if you cant take mate!! That's a bit rich Paul, after your attack on Karl in rant 8) 8) Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 12, 2009, 04:28:29 PM Nope, no PH involvement in this. Someone else (CDAA Officer actually), approached landowner directly with concerns about the environmental sensitivity of the site. becarefull until you know all the facts, remember you gave out private details of instructors!!!!!!!! I believe that the individual spoke to the landowner of another non CDAA controlled site not the Scotts???? The fact that I do know is that you're a fuckwit Paul no need to get personal Ian , I wonder if that will come up if you run for SD? hmmmm. Ian dont give if you cant take mate!! That's a bit rich Paul, after your attack on Karl in rant 8) 8) I dont think I have ever said there is anything wrong with double standards Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: Gooey on August 12, 2009, 06:22:37 PM Oh, so old, so boring, so you paul....... :'( :'( :'(
Title: Re: Barnoolut??? Post by: ph on August 13, 2009, 06:30:44 AM Oh, so old, so boring, so you paul....... :'( :'( :'( there you are you little turd, come out to play have we |